The cost of a wrong
yes has never been
higher.

AI made every company look investable. Here, revenue comes out of their Stripe and product out of their repo — and every claim states where it came from.

Including the claims that came from the founder. Those say so.

signed at sourcemandate · AI infra · pre-seed
Company #C-4417identity withheld
UK · developer tooling · £500k at £6m post
Next step
Request access
Revenue is connector-verified from Stripe, 2 days old. Two claims are still self-reported.
fit 86%4 verifiedstripe live-mode2d old
rules-based · from the evidence on this card
Where each claim came from
£3.1k MRR, collectedstripe live-mode
Product live, architecture coherentrepo scan
Entity & directors confirmedcompanies house
412 weekly actives, 6-wk retentionanalytics
Not proven
~Test coverage not instrumentedwe say so
Request access Ask one question
Every claim is labelled
verifiedread from a connector or a local scan
inferredderived by Hassle from approved evidence
self-reportedthe founder said it — nobody has confirmed it
staleneeds a refresh before you rely on it
What this is

A CRM stores what founders
told you. This is a room
they let you into.

Access is scoped, expiring and granted by the founder. Your analyst, your counsel and your accountant work inside it on the same logged record — nothing arrives as an attachment.

0unlabelled claims
You always know which figures were read and which were said.
verified · inferred · self-reported · stale
2sides, one record
Your counsel and accountant. Theirs too. Same room, same scope, same log.
no version of that exists in a CRM
100%logged both ways
Every question you ask, every grant you hold.
you're being screened too
The difference

Everyone else hands you a score.
We hand you the decision.

A number makes you do the work again. Hassle states the conclusion on the card — and shows the rule that produced it, so you can disagree with it on sight.

Request access

Fit is high, the revenue claim comes from a live connector, and the gaps that remain are named on the card.

fit ≥ 80 · verified claims ≥ 3 · gaps ≤ 2
Ask one question first

The claim the case rests on is self-reported. One scoped question closes it — before a partner reads anything.

self-reported ≥ verified · or retention proof absent
Decide now — evidence expiring

The grant behind these claims lapses shortly. After that you're reading history, not evidence.

freshness: expired · time-critical, outranks everything below
Review conflict first

Someone at the fund has already touched this company. Handle it before it reaches a partner meeting.

conflict flag on record
Don't spend partner time yet

Low fit, thin evidence. Monitor it — you'll be told when the evidence actually changes.

fit ≤ 70 · verified claims ≤ 2

Rules-based and visible. No hidden model decides what you look at, and the recommendation never replaces your judgement — it just stops you re-deriving it forty times a week.

Your mandate is the filter

It gets sharper every
time you use it.

Describe what you back, once. Every pass you log tightens what reaches you next week — which is why your mandate is worth nothing to the fund next door.

investor@hassle — mandate

The model explains the evidence

It never becomes the evidence. Verification comes from scans, connectors and signed sources — never from a model's guess.

Your agent, your provider

Funds can route diligence through their own approved model. Policy and redaction still run before every call.

Honest uncertainty

When something can't be verified, the answer says so instead of guessing. See the trust model

The close

Someone regulated puts
their name on it.

Diligence ends in a signature, and a signature is where the risk actually sits. So the last mile isn't a summary — it's connector-verified accounts and an SRA-regulated solicitor's signed attestation. Both live today.

01

Accounts, not assertions

Figures read straight from the connected accounts and reconciled before anyone signs anything.

verified at source · dated
02

A solicitor attests

An SRA-regulated solicitor signs the attestation. Reliance is stated inline, and their name is on the record.

sra-regulated · signed · logged
03

A room we can't read

The Confidential Data Room will be sealed — a diligence room Hassle has no way into. In development, not open yet.

in development · priced per close, not per seat

Accounts and attestation are live today, scoped to a single matter. The sealed room is not — we say which parts aren't built, because that is the same discipline we apply to founders' claims.

Specialist workspaces

Bring legal and fund ops into the room.

When a company reaches review or transaction stage, funds can invite legal reviewers and fund-ops specialists into scoped workspaces. They only see what their role requires, and every action is audited.

A legal reviewer is scoped to the corporate and legal register — no technical evidence, no customer data. The scope is enforced by policy on every read, not promised in a contract. The founder approves the invite, and can revoke it.

How a specialist gets in

  • You move a company to legal review or transaction ops
  • You invite by email, with the scope chosen up front
  • The link is single-use, expiring and deal-scoped
  • They land inside that matter — and nothing else
  • Every read, request and export is audit-logged

What a specialist never gets

  • Your other deals, or another fund's room
  • Technical evidence outside their role
  • Raw code, raw books or customer data
  • A seat that outlives the matter
House rules

What you can't do here.

These aren't our rules. They're the founders'. It's the reason the ones you can't otherwise reach are on it.

You can't buy placement

There is no promoted tier. Mandate fit and evidence decide routing, and nothing you pay changes the order.

You can't see who they are until they agree

Previews are anonymised. Identity arrives when the founder approves your request — scoped, expiring, revocable.

You can't take the raw material

No repo access, no bank exports, no customer data. You get signed claims, each cited to the system it came from.

You can't ask off the record

Every question and grant is logged on both sides. Founders see your response time and whether you honour scope.

Before you apply

We qualify you before
you qualify them.

We take a small number of Founding Mandate Partners per sector in the private beta, so a card landing in your inbox still means something. Four things get you in.

01A real, current mandateCheque range, stage, sector, exclusions. Vague mandates route badly, and we'd rather not take them.
02You answerFounders see response time and requests honoured. Quiet partners get recycled to funds that use it.
03You pass with a reasonOne line. It sharpens your routing, and it's the only thing founders ask of you in return.
04You're deploying nowThe beta is for capital in market this quarter — not for browsing the network.
What founders see about you
Replies within6 hrs
Scope honoured12 / 12
Passes with a reason100%
Founders ghosted0

Your record on the other side of the table. It decides who opens a room for you.

Be right earlier.

Companies that couldn't write their own numbers, matched to what you actually back.

> hassle mandate list